UNOFFICIAL/EXPERIMENTAL
Start here when you want to know what is proven today.
Plain-English Status
The current catalog is useful, but it is not a blanket production support claim.
Top-20:
Good public catalog examples.
Every chart has maintained bases, proof artifacts, and at least one live lane.
Exact proof still depends on the chart/base/lane row.
Top-100:
Good maintained proof corpus.
Every chart has render parity against regular Helm.
Most charts still need catalog review, useful variants, or selected live lanes.
Top-500:
Good reconnaissance data.
It shows where Helm pain appears across public charts.
It is not a maintained recipe catalog.
Use the catalog when you want a chart and base to try. Use the lane summaries when you need to say exactly what has been proven for that chart/base. Use the production disposition pages when you need to decide whether a chart is ready for a specific production target.
Use the generated Claims Register when you want to check whether a public claim is backed, partial, planned, or explicitly refused.
Use the generated Master Catalog Matrix when you want the broad chart/version/base view in one browser page. It shows the current user route, strongest evidence, core-lane status, production scope, hooks, quirks, hard gap, and next action for each row.
For the remaining non-pass live rows, use the generated Live Parity Rerun Plan. The current queue includes target prerequisites, runtime/watch rows, image retention rows, render-input modeling work, and 16 two-cluster semantic parity defects that need inspection before they can become stronger live claims.
Product Frontiers
These are the main places where the catalog is useful but the product claim is still bounded. A chart can have strong render and live evidence while one of these frontiers remains open.
| Frontier | Current status |
|---|---|
| Field-complete provenance | Blast-radius prediction is scored by a generated accuracy harness: 13 measured cases, 13 passing, 0 failing, and 0 unmeasured value-source rows. The claim remains per measured case; not every rendered field in every chart has provenance. |
| Full change authority | ConfigHub can record and gate operations, but the repo does not yet prove a complete per-field authority model for every agent or user. |
| Reverse live-to-desired flow | Live observations are recorded. Authorized live fixes flowing back into desired state are still future product work. |
| Universal hook execution | The Kube Prometheus Stack direct example proves seven fresh-install steps. Its no-crds base also proves the 85.3.3 to 86.1.0 upgrade through Argo CD and Flux, including CRD, certificate, workload, webhook patch, setup-Job replacement, and runtime checks. ConfigHub does not yet select that route automatically, and other charts still need their own route decisions and receipts. This is not a claim that every Helm hook in the top-100 runs automatically. |
| Fleet-wide bounded propagation | Derived variants, blast-radius cases, and promotion examples exist, but a complete fleet propagation product is still being built. |
| Signatures as trust | The claims register enforces this as reviewer discipline: no evidence means no current claim, partial stays partial, and refused claims stay visible. Signatures still prove integrity and transport only within a named signer, authority, and verification context. |
The sceptic-proofing work is also not finished. The claims register, blast-radius scoreboard, torture suite, and environment matrix exist today. Cluster-matrix, external reproduction, time-travel re-verification, and the upgrade gauntlet remain open proof work.
Find The Answer Fast
One generated file answers each common evidence question. Open the file; do not rely on prose summaries for counts.
| Question | Open | What it gives you |
|---|---|---|
| What is the broad product status of this chart, version, and base? | Master Catalog Matrix | One browser table with user route, strongest evidence, core lanes, production scope, hooks, quirks, hard gaps, and next action. |
| Which top-20 charts are live tested? | Live E2E Summary | One row per chart: local kind live/e2e result and the strict witness columns. |
| Does the selected top-20 path match regular Helm in live clusters? | Live Helm-vs-ConfigHub Parity | One row per selected chart/base: regular Helm compared with ConfigHub delivery and live semantic parity. |
| Which latest chart versions are ready for promotion work? | Promotion Work Orders | Per-candidate work orders for newer upstream versions. |
| Which top-100 charts are covered, partial, or decision-needed? | Top-100 Coverage and Top-100 Readiness | Coverage-contract status per chart, and the adoption bucket with next action. |
| Which hard chart shows the model under serious Helm complexity? | Serious Chart Proof, Kube Prometheus Stack direct lifecycle proof, kube-prometheus-stack catalog page, Webhook Certificate Lifecycle Evidence, and Lifecycle Observations | CRDs, webhooks, RBAC, generated facts, dependency locks, a complete fresh-install sequence using the chart's actual setup Jobs, staged CRD/admission certificate evidence, live CRD upgrade rehearsal, and observed CRD/webhook/controller runtime behavior on related charts. |
| Is value-change blast radius measured or assumed? | Blast-Radius Accuracy | The generated harness currently scores 13 measured cases: 13 pass, 0 fail, and 0 value-source rows are unmeasured. |
| Which watch/blocked rows are trust signals, not failures? | cub-scout Watchlist and What We Refuse To Claim | Routed strict-witness findings with live effect and next action, and why publishing refusals is the trust model. |
| Which public claims are backed, partial, planned, or refused? | Claims Register | One row per claim with evidence paths, scoped verifier, and the limit that keeps the claim honest. |
| Which sceptic attacks have fixtures, and which are still partial? | Generative GitOps Fit, Blast-Radius Accuracy, Environment-Determinism Matrix, and Synthetic Torture Suite | The built attack fixtures for blast radius, environment determinism, and breaker charts, plus the open cluster-matrix, external-reproduction, time-travel, and upgrade-gauntlet work. |
| Why is a live row non-pass, and what reruns it? | Live Parity Rerun Plan | Non-pass rows separated into semantic defects, target prerequisites, runtime watch, and lifecycle work. |
| Is this chart ready for my production target? | Production Disposition and Production Support Decisions | What is still required per chart, and how review-ready becomes supported for one target scope. |
Source Of Truth
The shortest generated status page is:
It summarizes top100 readiness, the retained top500 evidence map, proof lanes, hook and quirk residues, derived ConfigHub variants, GitOps/OCI, and live parity in one place.
The shortest generated answer for "can I use this chart?" is:
It gives one row per top-100 chart and routes the chart to one of four user answers: use the public catalog now, promote after review, design a useful base variant first, or decide a named limitation before promotion.
The compact top-20 catalog status CSV is:
It gives one row per catalog chart with supported base variants, strongest evidence, lane counts, hard gaps, and next action.
The top-20 base readiness table is the shortest answer for which base variant to try first:
It gives one row per top-20 base variant with start-here, try-with-proof, prerequisite, runtime, or hook lifecycle status.
The next80 queue is the shortest answer for which proof-grade non-catalog chart to promote, review, or improve next:
It separates the next80 into promotion review, limitation review, and user-shaped variant work, with source features and artifact links.
The refresh-survival report is the shortest answer for what happens when upstream Helm publishes a newer chart version:
It keeps supported versions pinned, lists upstream update candidates, and shows which candidate versions have only passed the render proof lane so far.
Production support is tracked separately from test evidence:
It shows which top-20 charts still need explicit decisions for scan/gate warnings, lifecycle behavior, target facts, storage policy, RBAC, webhooks, extension slots, and operating policy before they can be called production-supported.
The shortest assignable production-support work queue is:
It lists one row per concrete support task or keep-fresh item. A chart can have several rows because image, scan, lifecycle, runtime, and fresh-evidence work can be assigned independently.
The older chart-level production queue is still useful when you want one broad next action per chart:
The scan warning workdown is:
It routes external scan findings into concrete production work: fix in the installer base, add a resource policy, harden security context, explicitly accept or split privileged infrastructure, review runtime endpoints, or decide PDB policy.
The image digest workdown is:
It shows rendered image references that need digest resolution, image overrides, or explicit proof receipts before reproducible production OCI support.
The generated lane matrix is the authority for exact chart/version/base status:
The generated outcome coverage is the easiest spreadsheet-oriented entry point for chart, base, derived variant, and feature status:
The runtime/GitOps wave tracks the first Argo/OCI live rows:
The target-bound derived variant summary tracks ConfigHub variants created from uploaded bases and then bound to live targets:
The lifecycle observation summary tracks cert-manager and External Secrets checks that rendered YAML alone cannot prove:
Cert-Manager And External Secrets Lifecycle Observations
The Kube Prometheus Stack direct lifecycle proof records one complete fresh-install sequence: ten CRDs, the chart's certificate creation and webhook patch Jobs, 124 ordinary objects, readiness checks, and cleanup:
Kube Prometheus Stack Lifecycle Route Proof
The no-crds base also has an install-and-upgrade receipt through Argo CD and Flux. Both controllers installed the same 85.3.3 staged OCI digest, moved to the same 86.1.0 staged digest, replaced the completed setup Jobs, and passed the recorded CRD, certificate, workload, webhook patch, and runtime checks:
Kube Prometheus Stack Argo CD And Flux Proof
The controller receipt is limited to this version pair and target profile. It does not prove rollback, long-running soak, automatic ConfigHub route selection, or automatic post-success removal of every temporary hook resource.
The webhook certificate lifecycle summary tracks staged generated certificate material and staged CRDs for bases where render parity is not enough to prove the install contract:
Webhook Certificate Lifecycle Evidence
The cub-scout live witness watchlist records cases where ordinary live checks pass but strict rendered-object/live parity finds a target capability issue:
cub-scout Live Witness Watchlist
Accepted server-normalization rules for strict live witness checks are recorded separately:
Live Witness Normalization Rules
The hook/lifecycle boundary page separates hook queue rows from hook-like controller lifecycle observations:
The extension-slot coverage page tracks charts with raw manifests, tpl snippets, sidecars, config blocks, add-on slots, or similar Helm inputs:
The top-level catalog shows what a user can browse:
How To Read The Status
The project has several levels of evidence:
recipe/package proof
-> ConfigHub proof
-> local live Kubernetes proof
-> GitOps/OCI live proof
-> live Helm-vs-ConfigHub parity proof
-> lifecycle observation proof for controller-owned or hook-like behavior
A row is only proven for a lane when the lane matrix says pass.
Production support is stricter than a passing proof lane. A chart can be render-equivalent, locally tested, and useful for demos while still not being production-supported. Accepted dispositions are review input; production support needs a final target-scoped decision.
Strict cub-scout witness checks are routed more conservatively than ordinary local live checks. A local live receipt can pass because the workloads converge, while the strict witness still finds that the live API did not preserve an authored field. Every committed strict-witness BLOCK must appear either in the watchlist or in the normalization log.
In data/live-e2e/top20-local-kind.csv, cubScout=observed means the row has committed cub-scout witness evidence summarized in the CSV. A blank cubScout cell means the row still has its ordinary observation receipt, but no committed cub-scout witness for that row. It is not a hidden pass or fail.
Receipt retention follows this policy:
- commit worked-example receipts and evidence needed by public walkthroughs;
- commit every receipt or evidence summary cited by a watchlist row;
- keep bulk transient run artifacts local when the generated summaries are the public surface;
- when a claim depends on live evidence, commit enough detail for a reader to understand the target, chart, base, result, and next action.
Current Interpretation
The repo has complete render-parity evidence for the current recipe/base rows. ConfigHub proof, local live proof, GitOps/OCI proof, and strict live Helm-vs-ConfigHub proof are tracked separately because each one proves a different outcome.
Current aggregate status:
chart/base rows: 199
helm_template_vs_installer_setup: 199 pass, 0 missing
confighub_upload_variant_scan_safe_ops: 198 pass, 1 missing
local_kind_kubectl_apply: 148 pass
confighub_oci_argo_live: 135 pass
live_helm_vs_confighub_dual_compare: 135 pass, 53 watch, 10 blocked
two_cluster_kind_parity: 121 pass, 10 watch, 47 blocked
Those counts come from the generated lane matrix: Outcome Coverage.
The missing rows are backlog. They are not failed rows. watch and blocked mean a committed receipt exists and the lane found a target, lifecycle, or fixture condition that still needs a decision or rerun.
GitOps/OCI live proof is tracked in two views:
- the broad outcome lane has 135 of 199 chart/base rows marked pass;
- the first runtime/GitOps wave has 11 committed controller receipts;
- 8 first-wave receipts pass and 3 are non-pass target-fit or runtime receipts;
- exact chart/base/controller status is in the generated runtime summary: Runtime/GitOps Wave.
Live Helm-vs-ConfigHub parity is selected-row evidence:
- The selected live comparison lane has 198 committed receipts.
- 135 rows pass, 53 rows are watch, and 10 rows are blocked.
- The lane currently has 0 ConfigHub/OCI semantic parity defect receipts.
- Watch and blocked rows are routed to target prerequisites, capability profiles, render-input modeling, image retention, runtime readiness, or GitOps controller review before a stronger live claim is made.
- Across the full 199-row lane matrix, use the generated outcome coverage to distinguish pass rows, committed non-pass receipts, and rows without a pass.
- The comparison checks regular Helm against ConfigHub delivery and records the expected installer-added Namespace object and any semantic object diffs.
- Exact chart/base status is in the generated summary: Live Helm-vs-ConfigHub Parity.
Strict two-cluster Helm-vs-installer parity now has 178 committed receipts:
- 121 rows pass;
- 10 rows are watch;
- 47 rows are blocked;
- 153 rows have semantic object parity;
- 16 rows currently report a semantic parity defect.
Use the generated rerun plan for the next command and expected remediation: Live Parity Rerun Plan.
For the shortest active queue, use: Active Proof Queue.
The current rerun queue has 119 rows: 62 watch rows, 57 blocked rows, 63 ConfigHub/OCI comparison rows, 56 two-cluster kind-parity rows, and 16 semantic parity defects. One row is documented as resolved by a separate useful base and is no longer active rerun work.
Production support decisions are now explicit for the top-20 catalog:
- 17 of 20 top-20 charts have supported target-scoped proof scopes.
- 2 of 20 top-20 charts are superseded deprecated source charts and remain catalog proof evidence only.
- 0 of 20 top-20 charts have rejected target-scoped proof scopes.
- 1 of 20 top-20 charts has a draft support decision.
- 19 of 20 are production-review-ready by pre-review disposition receipt.
- 1 of 20 still has a blocked pre-review production disposition.
- 105 production-disposition receipts are accepted across 20 charts.
- external scan work has 0 remaining mutable-image rows after the current supported-base image pinning pass.
- the remaining high-priority scan rows are routed to explicit privileged infrastructure or security disposition work, not to simple image-pin fixes.
- A supported target scope is still narrow: it covers the named chart, base, target, delivery path, accepted risks, and live evidence rule only.
The top-20 production queue has one remaining pre-review disposition blocker: cert-manager needs target-fact preflight closure. Vault is currently a draft target-scoped support decision for the default base; its dev-mode base remains documented as local/demo evidence rather than a production support path. The active support view is grouped from the current target-scoped decisions. Workstreams can overlap: one chart can need image, scan, lifecycle, and fresh evidence work before it becomes production-supported for a target scope.
| Decision group | Charts | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Supported scope evidence | 17 | Keep target-scoped evidence fresh before using the supported scope as a production example. |
| Superseded source chart | 2 | Keep the existing proof as evidence, but review a maintained chart source before making a production-support claim. |
| Rejected default base | 0 | No current top-20 support decisions are rejected. |
| Draft support decision | 1 | Resolve the remaining target-scoped draft before making a production-support claim. |
Use the target-scoped decision table for exact blockers and next actions: Production Support Decisions.
For the plain-English path from review-ready to production-supported, see the user guide: Production Support Decisions.
Use the generated production disposition table when you need the pre-review receipts and accepted dispositions: Production Disposition.
Use the scan workdown when the question is what kind of work a scan warning represents: Scan Disposition Workdown.
Use the detailed disposition plan when you need the accepted receipts, owners, required evidence, and unblock rules: Production Disposition Details.
Use the generated support work-item queue when you want assignable production tasks: Production Support Work Items.
Use the generated disposition queue when you want the older one-row-per-chart production action: Production Next Actions.
Lifecycle observation proof has started:
- 11 public top-100 source-scan rows contain Helm hooks.
- 5 maintained hook queue rows now have hook route receipts.
- 5 of those 5 queue rows have lifecycle observation receipts.
- 0 of those 5 queue rows have only partial install-lifecycle observations.
- cert-manager
defaultandcrds-enabledpass lifecycle checks for itsstartupapicheckhook route, CRD ownership policy, startup API readiness, webhook CA bundle injection, and server dry-run. - External Secrets
defaultandno-crdspass lifecycle checks for CRD ownership policy, webhook CA bundle injection, controller-populated webhook Secret data, and server dry-run. - These receipts demonstrate the lifecycle-observation pattern. They do not imply that all Helm hooks or controller-owned runtime behavior are supported automatically.
Use the hook boundary report for the current route-selected versus lifecycle-observed split: Hook And Lifecycle Boundary.
Target-bound derived ConfigHub variant proof has started:
- The generated target-bound derived variant summary shows the current pass and blocked rows: Target-Bound Derived Variants.
NGINX-prod-us-eastwas created from a clean uploaded NGINXhttp-clusteripbase withcub variant create --target, applied to a ConfigHub OCI target, reconciled by Argo CD, and observed as a live NGINX Deployment in Kubernetes.NGINX-customer-acme-prodrepeats that same path for a customer-derived NGINX variant from the reviewedhttp-clusteripbase.MetricsServer-prod-us-eastproves the same target-bound path for a cluster-service chart; the receipt records Deployment, Service, and APIService availability.Prometheus-prod-us-eastwas created from a clean uploaded Prometheusserver-only-ephemeralbase withcub variant create --target, applied to a ConfigHub OCI target, reconciled by Argo CD, and observed as a live Prometheus server Deployment in Kubernetes.Prometheus-staging-eu-westrepeats that same target-bound path for a staging derived variant from the same reviewed Prometheusserver-only-ephemeralbase.- These receipts prove the derived-variant operating path for a small web chart, a cluster-service chart, and a server-only observability chart across production, staging, and customer-derived variants: clone the reviewed base, bind a real target, apply the cloned workload Units, and record Argo/runtime evidence.
Redis-staging-eu-westhas a blocked target-bound receipt. The work order asks for a namespace change and Redis Secret delivery, but those are not yet represented as checked post-clone mutations or secret/fact bindings in the derived variant path.- The other derived-variant receipts remain intended-state clone/link evidence until they have target-bound live receipts.
For the details, read the generated summaries rather than copying numbers from this page.
Useful Next Pages
| Question | Page |
|---|---|
| Where are the outcome CSVs? | Outcomes And Tests |
| What are the verification lanes? | Verification Lanes |
| What can I install? | Catalog |
| How do I run the tutorial path? | Tutorial Sequence |
| How do variants work? | Creating Variants |
| What compact work queue should we pick from next? | Next-Ten Waves |
| What is the broader generated workdown? | Attack Plan Workdown |
| What is the current execution plan? | Large Machine Roadmap |